Formal Title IX Grievance Process
Federally-Mandated Final Rule Under Title IX
On May 30, 2020, Barnard College informed its community that the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights had issued a Final Rule under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972. The Final Rule defines the meaning of “sexual harassment” (including forms of sex-based violence), describes how schools must respond to reports of misconduct falling within the new definition of sexual harassment, and sets forth a grievance process that schools must follow in these specific covered cases before issuing a disciplinary sanction against a person accused of sexual harassment.
On August 14, despite the repeated objections of many of those institutions — including Barnard — and tens of thousands of individuals, the Final Rule took effect.
Put most simply, these regulations mandate a more formal process, including a live hearing and the right to cross-examination, to address a narrowly-defined set of cases. Barnard’s Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment and Grievance Procedures for Gender-Based Misconduct, Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking remain in full force and effect. Complaints that include allegations of both Gender-Based Misconduct and misconduct under the new Title IX procedure will be investigated and adjudicated under the Title IX procedure.
The regulations permit institutions to impose a higher standard of evidence for investigations and determinations. However, Barnard has chosen to maintain the “preponderance of the evidence” standard is applicable to the Policy Against Discrimination & Harassment, including Gender-Based Misconduct, Sexual Harassment, Sexual Assault, Domestic Violence, Dating Violence, and Stalking.
Barnard remains committed to providing an environment free from unlawful discrimination, harassment, or retaliation. Students, faculty, or staff members who have questions about these changes, or wish to learn more about what is involved in filing or pursuing a Title IX complaint, should contact Dr. Elizabeth Scott- Francis, Barnard’s Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX. Dr. Scott-Francis can be reached by email at firstname.lastname@example.org. The Office of Nondiscrimination and Title IX is currently operating remotely and is available from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday.
Formal Title IX Grievance Process Overview
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972 prohibits any person in the United States from being discriminated against on the basis of sex in seeking access to any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance. The U.S. Department of Education, which enforces Title IX, has long defined the meaning of Title IX’s prohibition on sex discrimination broadly to include various forms of sexual harassment and sexual violence that interfere with a student’s ability to equally access our educational programs and opportunities.
On May 19, 2020, the U.S. Department of Education issued a Final Rule under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 that:
- Defines the meaning of “sexual harassment” (including forms of sex-based violence),
- Addresses how schools must respond to reports of misconduct falling within that definition of sexual harassment, and
- Mandates a grievance process that schools must follow to comply with the law in these specific covered cases before issuing a disciplinary sanction against a person accused of sexual harassment.
See, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026 (May 19, 2020). The full text of the Final Rule and its extensive Preamble are available here: http://bit.ly/TitleIXReg
The Title IX Grievance Policy will become effective on August 14, 2020, and will only apply to sexual harassment alleged to have occurred on or after August 14, 2020. Based on the Final Rule, Barnard College (“Barnard” or the “College”) will implement the following Title IX Grievance Policy, effective August 14, 2020. Incidents of sexual harassment alleged to have occurred before August 14, 2020, will be investigated and adjudicated according to the process in place at the time the incident allegedly occurred.
Our existing Office of Nondiscrimination and Title IX and reporting structure is in place to address concerns of discriminatory or harassing behavior, including the spectrum of sexual violence. What has required is the way our the Nondiscrimination and Title IX Director will handle resolution of different types of reports arising from sexual misconduct, as detailed in full in the Formal Title IX Grievance Process.
General Rules of Application
This Title IX Grievance Process became effective on August 14, 2020 (revised September 2021), and will only apply to formal complaints of sexual harassment brought on or after August 14, 2020.
Should any portion of the Title IX Final Rule, 85 Fed. Reg. 30026 (May 19, 2020), be stayed or held invalid by a court of law, or should the Title IX Final Rule be withdrawn or modified not to require the elements of this policy, this policy, or the invalidated elements of this policy, will be deemed revoked as of the publication date of the opinion or order and for all reports after that date, as well as any elements of the process that occur after that date if a case is not complete by that date of opinion or order publication. Should the Title IX Grievance Policy be revoked in this manner, any conduct covered under the Formal Title IX Grievance Process shall be investigated and adjudicated under the existing Nondiscrimination and Harassment Resolution Process.
The requirements and protections of this policy apply equally regardless of sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, or other protected classes covered by federal or state law. All requirements and protections are equitably provided to individuals regardless of such status or status as a Complainant, Respondent, or Witness. Individuals who wish to file a complaint about Barnard’s policy or process may contact the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights using contact information available at https://ocrcas.ed.gov/contact-ocr.
The procedures below may be used to address collateral misconduct arising from the investigation of or occurring in conjunction with reported misconduct (e.g., vandalism, physical abuse of another), when alleged violations of the Policy are being addressed at the same time. All other allegations of misconduct unrelated to incidents covered by the Policy will be addressed through procedures described in the student, faculty, and staff codes of conduct/handbooks.
 At Barnard College, the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX acts as the Title IX Coordinator. Any reference to action taken by the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX/Title IX Coordinator is inclusive of action taken on behalf by a designee (i.e. deputy coordinator).
 Consult with qualified legal counsel on the complex interaction between the regulations and union rights under collective bargaining agreements.
- Advisor means a person chosen by a party or appointed by the institution to accompany the party to meetings related to the resolution process, to advise the party on that process, and to conduct cross-examination for the party at the hearing, if any.
- Complainant or reporting individual means an individual who is alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute harassment or discrimination based on a protected class; or retaliation for engaging in a protected activity.
- Complaint (formal) means a document submitted or signed by a Complainant or signed by the Title IX Coordinator alleging harassment or discrimination based on a protected class or retaliation for engaging in a protected activity against a Respondent and requesting that the College investigate the allegation.
- Confidential Resource means an employee who is not a Mandated Reporter of notice of harassment, discrimination, and/or retaliation (irrespective of Clery Act Campus Security Authority status).
- Day means a business day when Barnard College is in normal operation.
- Directly Related Evidence is evidence connected to the complaint, but is neither inculpatory (tending to prove a violation) nor exculpatory (tending to disprove a violation) and will not be relied upon by the investigation report.
- Education program or activity means locations, events, or circumstances where Barnard College exercises substantial control over both the Respondent and the context in which the sexual harassment or discrimination occurs and also includes any building owned or controlled by a student organization that is officially recognized by Barnard College.
- Final Determination: A conclusion by preponderance of the evidence that the alleged conduct did or did not violate policy.
- Finding: A conclusion by preponderance of the evidence that the conduct did or did not occur as alleged (as in a “finding of fact”).
- Title IX Formal Grievance Process refers to a method of formal resolution designated by the College to address conduct that falls within the policies included below, and which complies with the requirements of the Title IX regulations (34 CFR §106.45). This method of formal resolution is designated to address specific conduct that falls within the policy below.
- Grievance Process Pool includes any investigators, hearing officers, appeal officers, and Advisors who may perform any or all of these roles (though not at the same time or with respect to the same case).
- Hearing Decision-maker or Panel refers to those who have decision-making and sanctioning authority within Barnard’s grievance processes.
- Investigator means the person or persons charged by Barnard College with gathering facts about an alleged violation of this Policy, assessing relevance and credibility, synthesizing the evidence, and compiling this information into an investigation report and file of directly related evidence.
- Mandated Reporter means an employee of Barnard College who is obligated by policy to share knowledge, notice, and/or reports of harassment, discrimination, and/or retaliation with the Title IX Coordinator.
- Notice means that an employee, student, or third-party informs the Title IX Coordinator or other Official with Authority of the alleged occurrence of harassing, discriminatory, and/or retaliatory conduct.
- Official with Authority (OWA) means an employee of Barnard College explicitly vested with the responsibility to implement corrective measures for harassment, discrimination, and/or retaliation on behalf of tthe College.
- Parties include the Complainant(s) and Respondent(s), collectively.
- Title IX Formal Grievance Process means the Formal Grievance Process detailed below and defined above.
- Nondiscrimination & Harassment Resolution Process means the administrative resolution procedures that apply only when the Title IX Formal Grievance Process is not applicable or in cases of discrimination and/or harassment based on other protected status, as determined by the Title IX Coordinator.
- Relevant Evidence is evidence that tends to prove or disprove an issue in the complaint.
- Remedies are post-finding actions directed to the Complainant and/or the community as mechanisms to address safety, prevent recurrence, and restore access to Barnard’s educational program.
- Respondent means an individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of conduct that could constitute harassment or discrimination based on a protected class; or retaliation for engaging in a protected activity.
- Resolution means the result of an informal or Formal Grievance Process.
- Sanction means a consequence imposed by the College on a Respondent who is found to have violated this policy.
- Sexual Harassment is the umbrella category including the offenses of sexual harassment, sexual assault, stalking, and dating violence and domestic violence. See Section 17.b., for greater detail.
- Student is defined for the purpose of this policy as any individual who has accepted an offer of admission, or who is registered or enrolled for credit or non-credit bearing coursework, and who maintains an ongoing relationship with Barnard College.
- Title IX Coordinator is at least one official designated by the College to ensure compliance with Title IX and Barnard’s Title IX program. References to the Coordinator throughout this policy may also encompass a designee of the Coordinator for specific tasks.
- Nondiscrimination and Title IX Team refers to the Title IX Coordinator, any deputy coordinators, and any member of the Grievance Process Pool.
 NY 129-B indicates that the term “reporting individual” shall encompass the terms victim, survivor, complainant, claimant, witness with victim status, and any other term used by an institution to reference an individual who brings forth a report of a violation.”
 In Barnard’s grievance processes, panels are only convened in appeals proceedings.
 At Barnard, the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX is also the Title IX Coordinator.
Consistent with Barnard’s Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment, the College is committed to protecting the privacy of all individuals involved in a report of potentially prohibited conduct. Barnard will not share the identity of any individual who has made a report or complaint of harassment, discrimination, or retaliation; any Complainant; any individual who has been reported to be the perpetrator of sex discrimination; any Respondent, or any witness, except as permitted by the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232g; FERPA regulations, 34 CFR part 99; or as required by law; or to carry out the purposes of 34 CFR Part 106, including the conducting of any investigation, hearing, or grievance proceeding arising under these policies and procedures.
The College reserves the right to determine which Barnard officials have a legitimate educational interest in being informed about incidents that fall within this policy, pursuant to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA). The Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX will share only what information is necessary with those who need to know to preserve the parties’ rights and privacy. Information will be shared as necessary with Investigators, Decision-Makers, witnesses, and the parties.
 For the purpose of this policy, privacy and confidentiality have distinct meanings. Privacy means that information related to a complaint will be shared with a limited number of Barnard employees who “need to know” in order to assist in the assessment, investigation, and resolution of the report. All employees who are involved in the College’s response to notice under this policy receive specific training and guidance about sharing and safeguarding private information in accordance with state and federal law. The privacy of student education records will be protected in accordance with FERPA. Confidentiality exists in the context of laws (including Title IX) that protect certain relationships, including those who provide services related to medical and clinical care, mental health providers, counselors, and ordained clergy. The law creates a privilege between certain health care providers, mental health care providers, attorneys, clergy, spouses, and others, with their patients, clients, parishioners, and spouses. The College has designated individuals who have the ability to have privileged communications as Confidential Resources.
This Policy does not alter any of Barnard’s obligations under federal disability laws including the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. Parties may request reasonable accommodations for disclosed disabilities to the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX at any point before or during the Title IX Grievance Process that do not fundamentally alter the process. The Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX will not affirmatively provide disability accommodations that have not been specifically requested by the Parties, even where the Parties may be receiving accommodations in other Barnard programs and activities.
Making a Report Regarding Covered Sexual Harassment to Barnard
Any person may report sex discrimination, including sexual harassment (whether or not the person reporting is the person alleged to be the victim of conduct that could constitute sex discrimination or sexual harassment), in person, by mail, by telephone, or by electronic mail, using the contact information listed for the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX, or by any other means that results in the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX receiving the person’s verbal or written report.
Contact Information for the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX:
Name: Elizabeth Scott-Francis
Title: Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX
Email Address: email@example.com
Such a report may be made at any time (including during non-business hours) by using the telephone number or electronic mail address, or by mail to the office address listed for the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX.
The following Officials will provide privacy, but not confidentiality, upon receiving a report of conduct prohibited under this policy:
- Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX or designee.
- Other Required Reporters include faculty and most staff (including Teaching Assistants and students employed by the College and acting in an official capacity, such as Resident Advisers), who are required by the College to provide relevant information about gender-based misconduct complaints to the The Office of Nondiscrimination and Title IX. Staff within this office, in consultation with the appropriate Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX, are responsible for connecting students with supportive resources and working to ensure community safety.
The following Officials may provide confidentiality:
- Confidential Resources on campus include: Furman Counseling Center (clinicians are confidential resources), Being Barnard, Columbia University Chaplain, Ombuds Office, Primary Care Health Service, and advocates, on campus, at the Sexual Violence Response Rape Crisis/Anti-Violence Support Center or off campus at St. Luke’s Crime Victims Treatment Center. Contact information for on and off campus confidential resources can be found here.
Non-Investigatory Measures Available Under the Title IX Grievance Process
Barnard retains the authority to remove a respondent from Barnard’s program or activity on an emergency basis, where Barnard (1) undertakes an individualized safety and risk analysis and (2) determines that an immediate threat to the physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of covered sexual harassment justifies a removal.
If Barnard determines such removal is necessary, the respondent will be provided notice and an opportunity to challenge the decision immediately following the removal. If, after undertaking an individualized safety and risk analysis, Barnard determines that there is an immediate threat to the physical health or safety of any student or other individual arising from the allegations of misconduct, either of the following actions may be taken:
- Temporarily suspending a Respondent from specified activities and/or positions of leadership; and
- Temporarily suspending a Respondent from Barnard.
Barnard will provide notice about these supportive and interim measures only to those who need to know in order to make them effective.
Failure to comply with interim measures or other directives is a violation of Barnard’s Policy and may lead to additional disciplinary action.
Barnard retains the authority to place a non-student employee respondent on administrative leave during the Title IX Grievance Process, consistent with College policy.
The Formal Title IX Grievance Process
The College makes every reasonable effort to ensure that complaints are resolved as expediently and efficiently as possible. Many complaints may require extensive review, and time frames will vary depending on the complexity of the investigation and the severity and extent of the alleged misconduct. Additionally, any reference to “days” in this Policy and these Procedures refers to business days.
Upon receipt of a complaint or notice of an alleged violation of the Policy, the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX (or designee) initiates a prompt initial assessment to determine the next steps the College needs to take. The Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX will initiate at least one of three responses:
1) Offering supportive measures because the Complainant does not want to file a formal complaint; and/or
2) An informal resolution (upon submission of a formal complaint); and/or
3) A Formal Grievance Process including an investigation and a hearing (upon submission of a formal complaint).
The College uses the Formal Grievance Process to determine whether or not the Policy has been violated. If so, the College will promptly implement effective remedies designed to ensure that it is not deliberately indifferent to harassment or discrimination, their potential recurrence, and/or their effects.
Following receipt of notice or a complaint of an alleged violation of the Policy, the Title IX Coordinator engages in an initial assessment, typically within one to five (1-5) business days. The steps in an initial assessment can include:
● The Title IX Coordinator seeks to determine if the person impacted wishes to make a formal complaint, and will assist them to do so, if desired.
- If they do not wish to do so, the Title IX Coordinator determines whether to initiate a complaint themselves because a violence risk assessment based upon available information indicates a compelling threat to health and/or safety.
● If a formal complaint is received, the Title IX Coordinator assesses its sufficiency and works with the Complainant to make sure it is correctly completed.
● The Title IX Coordinator reaches out to the Complainant to offer supportive measures.
● The Title IX Coordinator works with the Complainant to ensure they are aware of the right to have an Advisor.
● The Title IX Coordinator works with the Complainant to determine whether the Complainant prefers a supportive and remedial response, an informal resolution option, or a formal investigation and grievance process.
- If a supportive and remedial response is preferred, the Title IX Coordinator works with the Complainant to identify their wishes, assesses their request(s), and implements accordingly. No Formal Grievance Process is initiated, though the Complainant can elect to initiate one later, if desired.
- If an informal resolution option is preferred, the Title IX Coordinator assesses whether the complaint is suitable for informal resolution and may then seek to determine if the Respondent is also willing to engage in informal resolution.
- If a Formal Grievance Process is preferred by the Complainant, the Title IX Coordinator determines if the misconduct alleged falls within the scope of the 2020 Title IX regulations :
- If it does, the Title IX Coordinator will initiate the formal investigation and grievance process, directing the investigation to address: an incident, and/or, a pattern of alleged misconduct, and/or , a culture/climate issue, based on the nature of the complaint.
- If alleged misconduct does not fall within the scope of the 2020 Title IX regulations, the Title IX Coordinator determines that the regulations do not apply (and will “dismiss” that aspect of the complaint, if any), assesses which policies may apply, which resolution process is applicable, and will refer the matter accordingly.
*Please note that dismissing a complaint under the 2020 Title IX regulations is solely a procedural requirement under Title IX which does not limit the College’s authority to address a complaint with an appropriate process and remedies.
Nothing in the Title IX Grievance Process or Nondiscrimination & Harassment Resolution Process prevents a complainant from seeking the assistance of state or local law enforcement alongside the appropriate on-campus process.
A complainant who files a Formal Complaint may elect, at any time, to address the matter through Barnard’s Informal Resolution Process. All Parties to a Formal Complaint must agree to enter the Informal Resolution Process through an informed written consent. Information about this Process is available here.
Barnard may consolidate Formal Complaints alleging covered sexual harassment against more than one respondent, or by more than one complainant against one or more respondents, or by one party against the other party, where the allegations of covered sexual harassment arise out of the same facts or circumstances.
The Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX will determine if the instant Title IX Grievance Process should apply to a Formal Complaint. The Process will apply when all of the following elements are met, in the reasonable determination of the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX:
- The conduct is alleged to have occurred on or after August 14, 2020;
- The conduct is alleged to have occurred in the United States;
- The conduct is alleged to have occurred in Barnard’s education program or activity; and
- The alleged conduct, if true, would constitute covered sexual harassment as defined in this policy.
If all of the elements are met, Barnard will investigate the allegations according to the Title IX Grievance Process.
Complaints that include allegations of both Gender-Based Misconduct and misconduct under the Formal Title IX process will be investigated and adjudicated under the Title IX process.
The College must dismiss a formal complaint or any allegations therein if, at any time during the investigation or hearing, it is determined that:
1) The conduct alleged in the formal complaint would not constitute sexual harassment as defined in the Policy, even if proved; and/or
2) The conduct is alleged to have occurred before August 14, 2020; and/or
3) The conduct did not occur in an educational program or activity controlled by the College (including buildings or property controlled by recognized student organizations) and/or the College does not have control of the Respondent; and/or
4) The conduct did not occur against a person in the United States; and/or
5) At the time of filing a formal complaint, a Complainant is not participating in or attempting to participate in the education program or activity at the College.
The College may dismiss a formal complaint or any allegations therein if, at any time during the investigation or hearing:
1) A Complainant notifies the Title IX Coordinator in writing that the Complainant would like to withdraw the formal complaint or any allegations therein; or
2) The Respondent is no longer enrolled in or employed by the recipient; or
3) Specific circumstances prevent Barnard from gathering evidence sufficient to reach a determination as to the formal complaint or allegations therein.
A Complainant who decides to withdraw a complaint may later request to reinstate it or refile it. Upon any dismissal, the College will promptly send written notice, simultaneously to the parties, of the dismissal and the rationale for doing so, and describe other applicable action related to the matter. This dismissal decision is appealable by any party under the relevant appeal procedures. The decision not to dismiss is also appealable by any party claiming that a dismissal is required or appropriate.
Upon any dismissal, the College will promptly send written notice, simultaneously to the parties, of the dismissal and the rationale for doing so, and describe other applicable action related to the matter. This dismissal decision is appealable by any party under the relevant appeal procedures. The decision not to dismiss is also appealable by any party claiming that a dismissal is required or appropriate. Barnard retains discretion to utilize the Code of Conduct and/or other resolution processes to determine if a violation of the Code of Conduct and/or Policy Against Discrimination and Harassment or Workplace Violence Policy has occurred. If so, Barnard will promptly send written notice of the dismissal of the Formal Title IX Complaint under the Title IX Grievance Process and intent to address the allegations under applicable process. It is the responsibility of parties to maintain and regularly check their College email accounts.
The Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX will provide written notice of the investigation and allegations (the “NOIA”) to the Respondent upon commencement of the Formal Title IX Grievance Process. This facilitates the Respondent’s ability to prepare for the interview and to identify and choose an Advisor to accompany them. The NOIA is also copied to the Complainant, who will be given advance notice of when the NOIA will be delivered to the Respondent.
The NOIA will include:
● A meaningful summary of all allegations,
● The identity of the involved parties (if known),
● The precise misconduct being alleged,
● The date and location of the alleged incident(s) (if known),
● The specific policies implicated; A description of the applicable procedures,
● A statement of the potential sanctions/responsive actions that could result,
● A statement that the College presumes the Respondent is not responsible for the reported misconduct unless and until the evidence supports a different determination,
● A statement that determinations of responsibility are made at the conclusion of the process and that the parties will be given an opportunity to inspect and review all directly related and/or relevant evidence obtained during the review and comment period,
● A statement about the College’s policy on retaliation,
● Information about the confidentiality of the process,
● Information on the need for each party to have an Advisor of their choosing and suggestions for ways to identify an Advisor,
● A statement informing the parties that Barnard’s Policy prohibits knowingly making false statements, including knowingly submitting false information during the resolution process,
● Detail on how the party may request disability accommodations during the interview process,
● The name(s) of the Investigator(s), along with a process to identify to the Title IX Coordinator, in advance of the interview process, any conflict of interest that the Investigator(s) may have, and
● An instruction to preserve any evidence that is directly related to the allegations.
Amendments and updates to the NOIA may be made as the investigation progresses and more information becomes available regarding the addition or dismissal of various allegations. Notice will be made in writing and may be delivered by one or more of the following methods: in person, or emailed to the parties’ Barnard-issued email or designated accounts. Once emailed and/or received in-person, notice will be presumptively delivered.
If, in the course of an investigation, Barnard decides to investigate allegations about the complainant or respondent that are not included in the Notice of Allegations and are otherwise covered "sexual harassment” falling within the Title IX Grievance Process, or other College Policy, Barnard will notify the parties whose identities are known of the additional allegations by their Barnard email accounts or other reasonable means.
The parties will be provided sufficient time to review the additional allegations to prepare a response before any initial interview regarding those additional charges.
Advisor of Choice and Participation of Advisor of Choice
All parties may have an Advisor of their choice present with them for all meetings, interviews, and hearings within the grievance process, if they so choose. The parties may select whoever they wish to serve as their Advisor as long as the Advisor is eligible and available.
Who Can Serve as an Advisor
The Advisor may be a friend, mentor, family member, attorney, or any other individual a party chooses to advise, support, and/or consult with them throughout the grievance process. The parties may choose Advisors from inside or outside of the Barnard community. The Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX will also offer to assign a trained Advisor to any party if the party so chooses. If the parties choose an Advisor from the pool available from the College, the Advisor will have been trained by Barnard and be familiar with the grievance process. If the parties choose an Advisor from outside the pool of those identified by the College, the Advisor may not have been trained by the College and may not be familiar with College policies and procedures. Parties also have the right to choose not to have an Advisor in the initial stages of the resolution process, prior to a hearing.
Advisor’s Role in Meetings and Interviews
The parties may be accompanied by their Advisor in all meetings and interviews at which the party is entitled to be present, including intake and interviews. Advisors should help the parties prepare for each meeting and are expected to advise ethically, with integrity, and in good faith. Barnard has a long-standing practice of requiring individuals to participate in the process directly and not through an advocate, advisor, or representative. The Advisor of Choice is not an advocate. Except where explicitly stated by these procedures, as consistent with the Final Rule, Advisors of Choice shall not participate directly in the process as per standard policy and practice of the College.
Advisors in Hearings/ Barnard-Appointed Advisor
Under U.S. Department of Education regulations for Title IX , a form of indirect questioning is required during the hearing but must be conducted by the parties’ Advisors. The parties are not permitted to directly question each other or any witnesses. If a party does not have an Advisor for a hearing, the College will appoint a trained Advisor for the limited purpose of conducting any questioning of the other party(ies) and witnesses.
Advisors and their advisees may request or be asked by the College to meet with the investigators conducting interviews/meetings in advance of these interviews or meetings. Such pre-meeting allows Advisors to clarify and understand their role and Barnard’s policies and procedures. All Advisors are subject to the same College policies and procedures, whether they are attorneys or not, and whether they are selected by a party or assigned by the College. Advisors are expected to advise without disrupting proceedings.
The parties are expected to ask and respond to questions on their own behalf throughout the investigation phase of the resolution process. Although the Advisor generally may not speak on behalf of their advisee, the Advisor may consult with their advisee, either privately as needed, or by conferring or passing notes during any resolution process meeting or interview. For longer or more involved discussions, the parties and their Advisors should ask for breaks to allow for private consultation. Any Advisor who oversteps their role as defined by this policy will be warned only once. If the Advisor continues to disrupt or otherwise fails to respect the limits of the Advisor role, the scheduled meeting will end, or other appropriate measures implemented. Subsequently, the Title IX Coordinator will determine how to address the Advisor’s non-compliance and future role.
Sharing Information with the Advisor
The College expects that the parties may wish to have Barnard share documentation and evidence related to the allegations with their Advisors. The College provides a consent form that authorizes College officials involved in the process to share such information directly with a party’s Advisor. The parties must either complete and submit this form to the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX or provide similar documentation demonstrating consent to a release of information to the Advisor before Barnard is able to share records with an Advisor.
Privacy of Records Shared with Advisor
Advisors are expected to maintain the privacy of the records shared with them. Barnard may restrict the role of any Advisor who does not respect the sensitive nature of the process or who fails to abide by Barnard’s privacy expectations.
Expectations of an Advisor
The College generally expects an Advisor to adjust their schedule to allow them to attend related meetings when planned, but the College may change scheduled meetings to accommodate an Advisor’s inability to attend, if doing so does not cause an unreasonable delay. The College may also make reasonable provisions to allow an Advisor who cannot be present in person to attend a meeting by telephone, video conferencing, or other similar technologies as may be convenient and available.
Expectations of the Parties with Respect to Advisors
A party may elect to change Advisors during the process and is not obligated to use the same Advisor throughout. The parties are expected to inform the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX of the identity of their Advisor at least two (2) business days before the date of their first meeting with Investigators (or as soon as possible if a more expeditious meeting is necessary or desired). The parties are expected to provide timely notice to the Title IX Coordinator if they change Advisors at any time. It is assumed that if a party changes Advisors, consent to share information with the previous Advisor is terminated, and a release for the new Advisor is to be secured. Parties are expected to inform the Title IX Coordinator of the identity of their hearing Advisor at least two (2) business days before the hearing.
 “Available” means the party cannot insist on an Advisor who simply doesn’t have inclination, time, or availability. Also, the Advisor cannot have institutionally conflicting roles, such as being a Title IX administrator who has an active role in the matter, or a supervisor who must monitor and implement sanctions.
The College will make a good faith effort to complete the resolution process within a sixty-to-ninety (60-90) business day time period, including appeal if any. This timeframe may be extended as necessary for appropriate cause by the Title IX Coordinator, who will provide notice and rationale for any extensions or delays to the parties as appropriate, as well as an estimate of how much additional time will be needed to complete the process.
Appointment of Investigators and Ensuring Impartiality
Once the decision to commence a formal investigation is made, the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX appoints Pool members to conduct the investigation (typically using a team of two Investigators), usually within two (2) business days of determining that an investigation should proceed.
Any individual materially involved in the administration of the resolution process including the Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), and Decision-maker(s) may neither have nor demonstrate a conflict of interest or bias for a party generally, or for a specific Complainant or Respondent. The Title IX Coordinator will vet the assigned Investigator(s) for impartiality by ensuring there are no actual or apparent conflicts of interest or disqualifying biases. At any time during the resolution process, the parties may raise a concern regarding bias or conflict of interest, and the Title IX Coordinator will determine whether the concern is reasonable and supportable. If so, another Pool member will be assigned and the impact of the bias or conflict, if any, will be remedied.
The Formal Grievance Process involves an objective evaluation of all relevant evidence obtained, including evidence that supports that the Respondent engaged in a policy violation and evidence that supports that the Respondent did not engage in a policy violation. Credibility determinations may not be based solely on an individual’s status or participation as a Complainant, Respondent, or witness. The College operates with the presumption that the Respondent is not responsible for the reported misconduct unless and until the Respondent is determined to be responsible for a policy violation by a preponderance of the evidence.
Investigations are completed expeditiously, normally within thirty (30) business days, though some investigations may take weeks or even months, depending on the nature, extent, and complexity of the allegations, availability of witnesses, police involvement, etc. The College will make a good faith effort to complete investigations as promptly as circumstances permit and will communicate regularly with the parties to update them on the progress and timing of the investigation.
Delays in the Investigation Process and Interactions with Law Enforcement
The College may undertake a short delay in its investigation (several days to a few weeks) if circumstances require. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to: a request from law enforcement to temporarily delay the investigation, the need for language assistance, the absence of parties and/or witnesses, and/or accommodations for disabilities or health conditions. The College will communicate in writing the anticipated duration of the delay and reason to the parties, and provide the parties with status updates if necessary. The College will promptly resume its investigation and resolution process as soon as feasible. During such a delay, Barnard will implement supportive measures as deemed appropriate.
Barnard’s action(s) or processes are not typically altered or precluded on the grounds that civil or criminal charges involving the underlying incident(s) have been filed or that criminal charges have been dismissed or reduced.
Steps in the Investigation Process
All investigations are thorough, reliable, impartial, prompt, and fair. Investigations involve interviews with all relevant parties and witnesses; obtaining available, relevant evidence; and identifying sources of expert information, as necessary.
All parties have a full and fair opportunity, through the investigation process, to suggest witnesses and questions, to provide evidence and expert witnesses, and to fully review and respond to all evidence on the record. The Investigator(s) typically take(s) the following steps, if not already completed (not necessarily in this order):
● Determine the identity and contact information of the Complainant
● Identify all policies implicated by the alleged misconduct and notify the Complainant and Respondent of all of the specific policies implicated
● Assist the Title IX Coordinator, if needed, with conducting a prompt initial assessment to determine if the allegations indicate a potential policy violation
● Commence a thorough, reliable, and impartial investigation by identifying issues and developing a strategic investigation plan, including a witness list, evidence list, intended investigation timeframe, and order of interviews for all witnesses and the parties
● Meet with the Complainant to finalize their interview/statement, if necessary
● Work with the Title IX Coordinator, as necessary, to prepare the initial Notice of Investigation and Allegation (NOIA). The NOIA may be amended with any additional or dismissed allegations
- Notice should inform the parties of their right to have the assistance of an Advisor, who could be a member of the Pool or an Advisor of their choosing present for all meetings attended by the party
● Provide each interviewed party and witness an opportunity to review and verify the Investigator’s summary notes (or transcript) of the relevant evidence/testimony from their respective interviews and meetings
● Make good faith efforts to notify the parties of any meeting or interview involving the other party, in advance when possible
● When participation of a party is expected, provide that party with written notice of the date, time, and location of the meeting, as well as the expected participants and purpose
● Interview all available, relevant witnesses and conduct follow-up interviews as necessary
● Allow each party the opportunity to suggest witnesses and questions they wish the Investigator(s) to ask of the other party and witnesses, and document in the report which questions were asked, with a rationale for any changes or omissions
● Complete the investigation promptly and without unreasonable deviation from the intended timeline
● Provide regular status updates to the parties throughout the investigation
● Prior to the conclusion of the investigation, provide the parties and their respective Advisors (if so desired by the parties) with a list of witnesses whose information will be used to render a finding
● Write a comprehensive investigation report fully summarizing the investigation, all witness interviews, and addressing all relevant evidence. Appendices including relevant physical or documentary evidence will be included
● Prior to the conclusion of the investigation, provide the parties and their respective Advisors (if so desired by the parties) a secured electronic or hard copy of the draft investigation report as well as an opportunity to inspect and review all of the evidence obtained as part of the investigation that is directly related to the reported misconduct, including evidence upon which the College does not intend to rely in reaching a determination, for a ten (10) business day review and comment period so that each party may meaningfully respond to the evidence. The parties may elect to waive the full ten days. Each copy of the materials shared will be watermarked on each page with an indicator of the role of the person receiving it (e.g., Complainant, Respondent, Complainant’s Advisor, Respondent’s Advisor).
● The Investigator(s) may elect to respond in writing in the investigation report to the parties’ submitted responses and/or to share the responses between the parties for additional responses
● The Investigator(s) will incorporate relevant elements of the parties’ written responses into the final investigation report, include any additional relevant evidence, make any necessary revisions, and finalize the report. The Investigator(s) will document all rationales for any changes made after the review and comment period
● The Investigator(s) shares the report with the Title IX Coordinator and/or legal counsel for their review and feedback
● The Investigator will incorporate any relevant feedback, and the final report is then shared with all parties and their Advisors through secure electronic transmission or hard copy at least ten (10) business days prior to a hearing. The parties and advisors are also provided with a file of any directly related evidence that was not included in the report
The investigation does not consider: 1) incidents not directly related to the possible violation, unless they evidence a pattern; or 2) questions and evidence about the Complainant’s sexual predisposition; or 3) questions and evidence about the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior, unless such questions and evidence about the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior are offered to prove that someone other than the Respondent committed the conduct alleged by the Complainant, or if the questions and evidence concern specific incidents of the Complainant’s prior sexual behavior with respect to the Respondent and are offered to prove consent.
Within the boundaries stated above, the investigation can consider character evidence generally, if offered, but that evidence is unlikely to be relevant unless it is factual evidence or relates to a pattern of conduct.
All parties must submit any evidence they would like the investigator to consider prior to when the parties’ time to inspect and review evidence begins. Barnard will provide copies of the parties’ written responses to the investigation to all parties and their advisors, if any. Barnard will provide the parties five (5) business days after the initial inspection and review of evidence, and before the investigator completes their Investigative Report, to provide additional evidence in response to their inspection and review of the evidence. Barnard will then provide the parties five (5) business days to inspect, review, and respond to the parties additional evidence through a written response to the investigator. Those written responses will be disclosed to the parties and decision-maker, if applicable.
Barnard will provide the parties up to ten (10) business days to provide a response, after which the investigator will not be required to accept a late submission. Investigator has ten (10) business days to generate a report or, alternatively, may provide the parties with written notice extending the investigation for five (5) days and explaining the reason for the extension. The parties and their advisors and any witnesses must sign an agreement not to disseminate, photograph, or otherwise copy any of the evidence subject to inspection and review or use such evidence for any purpose unrelated to the Formal Title IX Grievance Process.
 See 85 Fed. Reg. 30026, 30307 (May 19, 2020).
Notice of Hearing
No less than ten (10) business days prior to the hearing , the Title IX Coordinator or the Chair will send notice of the hearing to the parties. Once emailed, and/or received in-person, notice will be presumptively delivered.
The notice will contain:
● A description of the alleged violation(s), a list of all policies allegedly violated, a description of the applicable hearing procedures, and a statement of the potential sanctions/responsive actions that could result.
● The time, date, and location of the hearing.
● Description of any technology that will be used to facilitate the hearing.
● Information about the option for the live hearing to occur, and how the parties will participate, including use of technology that enables the Decision-maker(s) and parties to see and hear a party or witness answering questions.
● A list of all those who will attend the hearing, along with an invitation to object to any Decision-maker(s) on the basis of demonstrated bias or conflict of interest. This must be raised with the Title IX Coordinator at least two (2) business days prior to the hearing.
● Information on how the hearing will be recorded and on access to the recording for the parties after the hearing.
● A statement that if any party or witness does not appear at the scheduled hearing, the hearing may be held in their absence, and the party’s or witness’s testimony and any statements given prior to the hearing will not be considered by the Decision-maker(s). For compelling reasons, the Decision-Maker may reschedule the hearing.
● Notification that the parties may have the assistance of an Advisor of their choosing at the hearing and will be required to have one present for any questions they may desire to ask. The party must notify the Title IX Coordinator if they do not have an Advisor, and the Recipient will appoint one. Each party must have an Advisor present. There are no exceptions.
● A copy of all the materials provided to the Decision-maker(s) about the matter, unless they have been provided already.
● An invitation to each party to submit to the Chair an impact statement pre-hearing that, only in the event of a responsible finding, the Decision-maker(s) will review during any sanction determination.
● An invitation to contact the Title IX Coordinator to arrange any disability accommodations, language assistance, and/or interpretation services that may be needed at the hearing, at least seven (7) business days prior to the hearing.
Hearings for possible violations that occur near or after the end of an academic term (assuming the Respondent is still subject to this Policy) and are unable to be resolved prior to the end of term will typically be held immediately after the end of the term or during the summer, as needed, to meet the resolution timeline followed by the College and remain within the 60-90 business day goal for resolution.
After any necessary consultation with the parties, the Chair will provide the names of persons who will be participating in the hearing, all pertinent documentary evidence, and the final investigation report to the parties at least ten (10) business days prior to the hearing.
The parties will be given the name(s) of the Decision-maker(s) at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing. All objections to any Decision-maker must be raised in writing, detailing the rationale for the objection, and must be submitted to the Title IX Coordinator as soon as possible and no later than two days prior to the hearing. Decision-makers will only be removed if the Title IX Coordinator concludes that their bias or conflict of interest precludes an impartial hearing of the allegation(s).
The Title IX Coordinator will give the Decision-maker(s) a list of the names of all parties, witnesses, and Advisors at least five (5) business days in advance of the hearing. Any Decision-maker who cannot make an objective determination must recuse themselves from the proceedings when notified of the identity of the parties, witnesses, and Advisors in advance of the hearing. If a Decision-maker is unsure of whether a bias or conflict of interest exists, they must raise the concern to the Title IX Coordinator as soon as possible.
During the ten (10) business day period prior to the hearing, the parties have the opportunity for continued review and comment on the final investigation report and available evidence. That review and comment can be shared with the Chair at a pre-hearing meeting or at the hearing and will be exchanged between each party by the Chair.
The Chair may convene a pre-hearing meeting(s) with the parties and/or their Advisors and invite them to submit the questions or topics they wish to ask or discuss at the hearing, so that the Chair can rule on their relevance ahead of time to avoid any improper evidentiary introduction in the hearing or to provide recommendations for more appropriate phrasing. However, this advance review opportunity does not preclude the Advisors from asking a question for the first time at the hearing or from asking for a reconsideration on a pre-hearing ruling by the Chair based on any new information or testimony offered at the hearing. The Chair must document and share with each party their rationale for any exclusion or inclusion at a pre-hearing meeting.
At each pre-hearing meeting with a party and their Advisor, the Chair will consider arguments that evidence identified in the final investigation report as relevant is, in fact, not relevant. Similarly, evidence identified as directly related but not relevant by the Investigator(s) may be argued to be relevant. The Chair may rule on these arguments pre-hearing and will exchange those rulings between the parties prior to the hearing to assist in preparation for the hearing. The Chair may consult with the Title IX Coordinator, or ask them to attend pre-hearing meetings. The pre-hearing meetings may be conducted as separate meetings with each party/advisors, with all parties/advisors present at the same time, remotely, or as a paper-only exchange. The Chair will work with the parties to establish the format.
At the hearing, the Decision-maker(s) has the authority to hear and make determinations on all allegations of discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation and may also hear and make determinations on any additional alleged policy violations that occurred in concert with the discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation, even though those collateral allegations may not specifically fall within the Policy Against Discrimination and harassment.
Participants at the hearing include the Decision-Maker/Chair, the hearing facilitator, the Investigator(s) who conducted the investigation, the parties, Advisors to the parties, any called witnesses, the Title IX Coordinator, and anyone providing authorized accommodations, interpretation, and/or assistive services. The Chair will answer all questions on procedure. Anyone appearing at the hearing to provide information will respond to questions on their own behalf.
The Chair will allow witnesses who have relevant information to appear at a portion of the hearing in order to respond to specific questions from the Decision-maker(s) and the parties, and the witnesses will then be excused.
In hearings involving more than one Respondent or in which two (2) or more Complainants have accused the same individual of substantially similar conduct, the default procedure will be to hear the allegations jointly. However, the Title IX Coordinator may permit the investigation and/or hearings pertinent to each Respondent to be conducted separately if there is a compelling reason to do so. In joint hearings, separate determinations of responsibility will be made for each Respondent with respect to each alleged policy violation.
The Order of the Hearing
For all live hearings conducted under the Formal Title IX Grievance Process, the order will be as follows:
The Chair explains the procedures, including rules and expectations for the hearing, and introduces the participants. This may include a final opportunity for challenge or recusal of the Decision-maker(s) on the basis of bias or conflict of interest. The Chair will rule on any such challenge unless the Chair is the individual who is the subject of the challenge, in which case the Title IX Coordinator will review and decide the challenge.
The Parties will each be given the opportunity to provide opening statements.
Investigator Presents the Final Investigation Report
The Investigator(s) will then present a summary of the final investigation report, including items that are contested and those that are not, and will be subject to questioning by the Decision-maker(s) and the parties (through their Advisors). The Investigator(s) will be present during the entire hearing process, but not during deliberations.
Neither the parties nor the Decision-maker(s) should ask the Investigator(s) their opinions on credibility, recommended findings, or determinations, and Advisors and parties will refrain from discussion of or questions for Investigators about these assessments. If such information is introduced, the Chair will direct that it be disregarded.
Testimony and Questioning
Once the Investigator(s) present(s) the report and are questioned, the parties and witnesses may provide relevant information in turn, beginning with the Complainant, and then in the order determined by the Chair. The hearing will facilitate questioning of parties and witnesses by the Decision-maker(s) and then by the parties through their Advisors.
All questions are subject to a relevance determination by the Chair. The Advisor, who will remain seated during questioning, will pose the proposed question orally, electronically, or in writing (orally is the default, but other means of submission may be permitted by the Chair upon request if agreed to by all parties and the Chair), the proceeding will pause to allow the Chair to consider the question (and state it if it has not already been stated aloud), and the Chair will determine whether the question will be permitted, disallowed, or rephrased. The Chair may invite explanations or persuasive statements regarding relevance with the Advisors, if the Chair so chooses. The Chair will then state their decision on the question for the record and advise the party/witness to whom the question was directed, accordingly. The Chair will explain any decision to exclude a question as not relevant, or to reframe it for relevance.
The Chair will limit or disallow questions on the basis that they are irrelevant, unduly repetitious (and thus irrelevant), or abusive. The Chair has final say on all questions and determinations of relevance. The Chair may consult with legal counsel on any questions of admissibility. The Chair may ask Advisors to frame why a question is or is not relevant from their perspective but will not entertain arguments from the Advisors on relevance once the Chair has ruled on a question. If the parties raise an issue of bias or conflict of interest of an Investigator or Decision-maker at the hearing, the Chair may elect to address those issues, consult with legal counsel, and/or refer them to the Title IX Coordinator, and/or preserve them for appeal. If bias is not in issue at the hearing, the Chair should not permit irrelevant questions that probe for bias.
Live Cross-Examination Procedure
Each party’s advisor will conduct live cross-examination of the other party or parties and witnesses. During this live cross-examination, the advisor may ask the other party of parties and witnesses relevant questions and follow-up questions, including those questions challenging credibility directly, orally, and in real time. Before any cross-examination question is answered, the Decision-maker will determine if the question is relevant. Questions asked during a hearing must be relevant to the allegations and the response to those allegations. Cross-examination questions that are duplicative of those already asked, including by the Decision-Maker, may be deemed irrelevant if they have been asked and answered.
Refusal to Submit to Questioning; Inferences
Whether a party or witness does or does not answer questions from the Decision-maker, their statements will be admissible. Any party or witness may choose not to offer evidence and/or answer questions at the hearing, either because they do not attend the hearing or because they attend but refuse to participate in some or all questioning. the Decision-Maker can only rely on whatever relevant evidence is available through the investigation and hearing in making the ultimate determination of responsibility. The Decision-maker(s) may not draw any inference solely from a party’s or witness’s absence from the hearing or refusal to answer cross-examination or other questions.
If collateral charges of policy violations other than sexual harassment are considered at the same hearing, the Decision-Maker(s) may consider all evidence it deems relevant, may rely on any relevant statement as long as the opportunity for questioning is afforded to all parties through their Advisors, and may draw reasonable inferences from any decision by any party or witness not to participate or respond to questions. If a party’s Advisor of choice refuses to comply with Barnard’s established rules of decorum for the hearing, the College may require the party to use a different Advisor. If a recipient-provided Advisor refuses to comply with the rules of decorum, the College may provide that party with a different Advisor to conduct questioning on behalf of that party.
Hearings (but not deliberations) are to be recorded by Barnard for purposes of review in the event of an appeal. The parties may not record the proceedings and no other unauthorized recordings are permitted. The recording of the hearing or a transcript will be available for review by the parties within five (5) business days, unless there are any extenuating circumstances. The parties or advisors of choice can review the recording or transcript either in person or via video conference. The recording of the hearing or transcript will not be provided directly to the parties or advisor of choice and parties are not permitted to make a copy or retain access to the recording or transcript beyond the period of review.
Determination Regarding Responsibility
The Decision-maker will deliberate in closed session to determine whether the Respondent is responsible or not responsible for the policy violation(s) in question. Barnard uses the preponderance of the evidence standard for investigations and determinations regarding responsibility of formal complaints under the Formal Title IX Grievance Process. This means that the investigation and hearing process determines whether it is more likely than not that a violation of the Policy occurred. When there is a finding of responsibility on one or more of the allegations, the Decision-maker may then consider the previously submitted party impact statements in determining appropriate sanction(s).
The Decision-maker will ensure that each of the parties has an opportunity to review any impact statement submitted by the other party(ies). The Decision-maker may – at their discretion – consider the statements, but they are not binding. The Decision-maker(s) will review the statements and any pertinent conduct history provided by the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX and will recommend the appropriate sanction(s) in consultation with other appropriate administrators, as required.
Written Determination Regarding Responsibility
The Decision-maker will prepare a deliberation statement and deliver it to the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX, detailing the identification of the allegations, a description of the procedural steps taken from the receipt of the formal complaint through the determination, findings of fact supporting the determination, conclusions regarding which section of the policy, if any, the respondent has or has not violated, rationale for determination, evidence used in support of their determination, the evidence not relied upon in their determination, credibility assessments, any recommended sanctions and rationale, and Barnard’s procedures to appeal. This report must be submitted to the Title IX Coordinator within two (2) business days of the end of deliberations, unless the Title IX Coordinator grants an extension. If an extension is granted, the Title IX Coordinator will notify the parties.
Using the deliberation statement, the Title IX Coordinator will work with the Decision-maker to prepare a Notice of Outcome letter. The Title IX Coordinator will share the letter, including the final determination, rationale, and any applicable sanction(s) with the parties and their Advisors within five (5) business days of receiving the Decision-maker(s)’ Written Determination Regarding Responsibility.
The Notice of Outcome will be shared with the parties simultaneously. Notification will be made in writing and may be delivered by email via the Barnard-issued email or otherwise approved account. The Title IX Coordinator will connect with the parties to advise that the Notice of Outcome is ready to be shared so individuals may best prepare to receive such notice. The Title IX Coordinator will also offer parties the opportunity to individually meet shortly after the delivery to provide any clarification or answer any questions about the outcome. Once mailed, emailed, and/or received in-person, notice will be presumptively delivered. The Notice of Outcome will articulate the specific policy(ies) reported to have been violated, including the relevant policy section, and will contain a description of the procedural steps taken by the College from the receipt of the misconduct report to the determination, including any and all notifications to the parties, interviews with parties and witnesses, site visits, methods used to obtain evidence, and hearings held.
The Notice of Outcome will specify the finding on each alleged policy violation; the findings of fact that support the determination; conclusions regarding the application of the relevant policy to the facts at issue; a statement of, and rationale for, the result of each allegation to the extent the College is permitted to share such information under state or federal law; any sanctions issued which the College is permitted to share according to state or federal law; and whether remedies will be provided to the Complainant to ensure access to the College’s educational or employment program or activity. The Notice of Outcome will also include information on when the results are considered by the College to be final, any changes that occur prior to finalization, and the relevant procedures and bases for any available appeal options.
Factors considered when determining a sanction/responsive action may include, but are not limited to:
- The nature, severity of, and circumstances surrounding the violation(s)
- The Respondent’s disciplinary history
- The need for sanctions/responsive actions to bring an end to the discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation; The need for sanctions/responsive actions to prevent the future recurrence of discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation
- The need to remedy the effects of the discrimination, harassment, and/or retaliation on the Complainant and the community
- The impact on the parties
- Any other information deemed relevant by the Decision-maker(s)
The sanctions will be implemented as soon as is feasible, either upon the outcome of any appeal or the expiration of the window to appeal without an appeal being requested. The sanctions described in this policy are not exclusive of, and may be in addition to, other actions taken or sanctions imposed by external authorities.
Failure to comply with Sanctions and/or Responsive Actions
All Respondents are expected to comply with the assigned sanctions, responsive actions, and/or corrective actions within the timeframe specified by the final Decision-maker(s) (including the Appeal Panel). Failure to abide by the sanction(s)/action(s) imposed by the date specified, whether by refusal, neglect, or any other reason, may result in additional sanction(s)/action(s), including suspension, expulsion, and/or termination from the College. A suspension will only be lifted when compliance is achieved to the satisfaction of the Title IX Coordinator.
Any party may appeal 1) the dismissal of a formal complaint or any included allegations and/or 2) a determination regarding responsibility. To appeal, a party must submit their written request for appeal to the Director of Nondiscrimination and Title IX within five (5) business days of the delivery of the Notice of Outcome, indicating the grounds for the appeal.
Appeals are limited to the following grounds:
- Procedural irregularity that affected the outcome of the matter (i.e. a failure to follow Barnard’s own procedures).
- New evidence that was not reasonably available at the time the determination of responsibility or dismissal was made, that could affect the outcome of the matter.
- The Title IX Coordinator, Investigator(s), or Decision-Maker had a conflict of interest or bias for or against an individual party, or for or against complainants or respondents in general, that affected the outcome of the matter.
- Excessiveness or insufficiency of the sanction: An appeal based on the imposed sanction must explain why the sanction is inappropriate based on the weight of the information provided during the investigation, hearing, and/or sanction.
The Request for Appeal will be forwarded to the Appeal Chair or designee for consideration to determine if the request meets the grounds for appeal (a Review for Standing). This review is not a review of the merits of the appeal, but solely a determination as to whether the request meets the grounds and is timely filed. If any of the grounds in the Request for Appeal do not meet the grounds above, that request will be denied by the Appeal Chair, and the parties and their Advisors will be notified in writing of the denial and the rationale. If any of the grounds in the Request for Appeal meet the grounds above, then the Appeal Chair will notify the other party(ies) and their Advisors, the Title IX Coordinator, and, when appropriate, the Investigators and/or the original Decision-maker(s).
The submission of appeal stays any sanctions for the duration of the appeal procedures. Supportive measures remain available during the appeal process. If a party appeals, Barnard will as soon as practicable notify the other party in writing of the appeal; however, the time for appeal shall be offered equitably to all parties and shall not be extended for any party solely because the other party filed an appeal.
The other party(ies) and their advisors will be given five (5) business days to submit a response to the portion of the appeal that was approved and involves them. All responses, if any, will be forwarded by the Appeal Chair to all parties for review and comment. The non-appealing party (if any) may also choose to raise a new ground for appeal at this time. If so, that will be reviewed to determine if it meets the grounds in this grievance process by the Appeal Chair and either denied or approved. If approved, it will be forwarded to the party who initially requested an appeal, the Investigator(s) and/or original Decision-maker(s), as necessary, who will submit their responses, if any, in five (5) business days, which will be circulated for review and comment by all parties. If not approved, the parties will be notified accordingly, in writing.
Appeals will be decided by an Appellate Panel that will be free of conflict of interest and bias, and will not serve as investigator, Title IX Coordinator, or hearing Decision-maker in the same matter. Attached to their appeal, the individual may provide a written submission for the Appellate Panel to consider. The written statement must be prepared by the individual and be no longer than five single-spaced typed pages. No attachments or exhibits will be accepted; references to evidence should be made to materials included in the Investigative Report.
Outcome of appeal will be provided in writing and delivered electronically simultaneously to both parties, and include rationale for the decision.
Following the conclusion of the resolution process, and in addition to any sanctions implemented, the Title IX Coordinator may implement additional long-term remedies or actions with respect to the parties and/or the campus community that are intended to stop the harassment, discrimination, and/or retaliation, remedy the effects, and prevent reoccurrence. These remedies/actions may include, but are not limited to:
- Referral to counseling and health services; Referral to the Employee Assistance Program
- Education to an individual and/or the community
- Permanent alteration of housing assignments; Permanent alteration of work arrangements for employees
- Provision of campus safety escorts
- Climate surveys
- Policy modification and/or training
- Implementation of long-term contact limitations between the parties
- Implementation of adjustments to academic deadlines, course schedules, etc.
At the discretion of the Title IX Coordinator, certain long-term support or measures may also be provided to the parties even if no policy violation is found. When no policy violation is found, the Title IX Coordinator will address any remedies owed by the College to the Respondent to ensure no effective denial of educational access. The College will maintain the confidentiality of any long-term remedies/actions/measures, provided confidentiality does not impair the College’s ability to provide these services.